Loss against the Benko gambit.   2007-10-21 01:17



Loomis (0) - Black (0)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/loomis/?game=992
(), , 2007.10.20

  1.d4   Nf6   2.c4   c5   3.d5   b5 The Benko gambit . I haven't played many long games against this, but I tend to do poorly. Black gambits a pawn for open files on the queenside. 4.cxb5   a6   5.bxa6   d6   6.Nc3   Bxa6   7.e4   Bxf1   8.Kxf1 I'm fairly certain this is a mainline. 8... g6   9.g3   Bg7   10.Nf3   Qb6   11.Kg2   O-O   12.a4 My idea here is that if I can secure the pawn on a4, I can keep a knight on b5 and blockade the play on the a and b files. I have to do something to allow the c1 bishop to stop babysitting b2. a4 also allows the rook some movement. 12... Nbd7   13.h4 This is probably not right. The idea is that my opponents play is more on the queenside, and with my king already on g2 maybe I can get play on the h-file. After the game, my opponent commented that many times h3 is played. This makes sense to keep the f6 knight from getting to e5. 13... h5   14.Qc2   Rfb8   15.Nb5 This was the plan, and I think it's ok. 15... Ng4   16.Ra2  

a)   16.Bg5 This was my top alternative and it may put more pressure on black.

16... c4   17.Ra3 Perhaps aiming for Be3.

a)   17.Rf1 It may be better to safeguard against threats at f2.

17... Nc5   18.Nfd4   Nd3  

a)   18...Nxa4   19.Nc6  

1)   19.Rxa4   Rxa4   20.Qxa4   Bxd4   21.Nxd4   Qxd4   22.Qc2 Looks good for black.

19... Rb7   20.Nc3  

19.Qxc4   Ndxf2   20.Rf1   Nxe4   21.Nc6 At this point I think I'm winning due to the dual threats against the rook on b8 and the knight on e4. 21... f5   22.Nxe7+ I think this is one of my typical mistakes. I've over estimated the attack against black's king. My plan, as followed in the game, is to give up the knight for 3 pawns and an exposing the black king. I could have simply taken on b8. 22... Kh7   23.Nxf5   gxf5   24.Rxf5 This was the position I envisioned at 22. Nxe7+, where I am threatening the knight on e4 and a fourth pawn on h5. I thought the black king with no pawn shelter would give me chances and my extra pawns means the possibility of going to an endgame where the outside connected passers are better than apiece. 24... Re8   25.Qc7 Maybe I should not have traded the queens. 25... Qxc7   26.Nxc7   Rf8 I didn't catch this when I played Qc7. 27.Raf3 This is a poor move where I simply overlook my weakness on the c-file. 27... Rxf5   28.Rxf5   Rc8   29.Ne6 I thought I could recoup my piece by Rf7 and taking the g7 bishop. This fails due to black's knights overwhelming the white king. 29... Rxc1   30.Rf7   Rc2+   31.Kg1  

a)   31.Kf3   Ne5+   32.Kxe4   Nxf7  

31... Ne3   32.Rxg7+  

a)   32.Rf3   Rg2+   33.Kh1   Nxg3+   34.Rxg3   Rxg3  

32... Kh8   33.Rf7  

a)   33.Rg6   Rg2+   34.Kh1   Nf2#  

33... Rg2+   34.Kh1   Nxg3# 0-1





Coffee House game   2007-09-05 03:06



Loomis (1700) - Coffe House Player (0)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/loomis/?game=954
unrated untimed match, Coffee House, 2007.09.01

  1.d4   Nf6   2.c4   e5   3.dxe5   Ng4   4.Bf4   Nc6   5.Nf3   Bb4+   6.Nbd2   Qe7   7.a3   Ngxe5   8.Nxe5 This is as far as I know this opening 8... Nxe5   9.e3   Bxd2+   10.Qxd2   O-O   11.Be2   d6   12.O-O   b6 I kind of like my bishop pair at this point, but his knight is so well placed I probably don't have a minor piece advantage 13.b4 I wanted to do something like taking the knight and getting on the long diagonal, but nothing seemed to pan out. 13... Bb7   14.Rab1 I'm hoping to break up the queen side pawns and find some weak ones in his camp. 14... Rad8   15.Qc3   Qf6   16.Bxe5   dxe5   17.c5   h5   18.b5 At this point I've really underestimated my opponent's position. I'm worried about queenside pawn structure while he's trying to mate me. 18... bxc5   19.Qxc5   Qg6   20.f3   Rd2 My queenside plans have worked, black has 3 hanging pawns! Meanwhile, I'm letting him checkmate me. 21.Qc4 This was terrible and loses immediately to Bd5. Rbe1 could have held on. In any case, it doesn't bail me out of the lesson I should learn from this game. 21... e4   22.f4   Bd5   23.Qc5   Rxe2   24.g3   Be6   25.f5   Qg5 0-1





Tournament, June 9th, Round 3   2007-06-10 07:07



Opponent (0) - Loomis (0)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/loomis/?game=940
G/75 (3), MyTown, 2007.06.09

  1.e4   c5   2.Nf3   Nc6   3.Bb5   g6   4.Bxc6   bxc6 Silman suggests dxc6. Whoops. 5.O-O   Bg7   6.c3   d5   7.exd5  

a)   7.e5   d4   8.cxd4   cxd4   9.Qa4   Bb7   10.Nxd4   Bxe5   11.Nf3   Bg7  

7... cxd5   8.d4   cxd4   9.Nxd4   Nf6   10.Re1   O-O   11.Bg5  

a)   11.Nc6   Qd6   12.Nxe7+   Kh8   13.Nxc8   Raxc8 +/-

11... Qb6   12.Qb3   Qd6   13.Nf3  

a)   13.Nb5   Qd7   14.Nd2   Rb8   15.a4   a6 -+

13... Rb8   14.Qc2   Bf5   15.Qe2   Ne4   16.Be3   e5 Maybe a little too anxious, it's probably not necessary to let the a-pawn go.

a)   16...Rb7   17.Nbd2   Rfb8  

1)   17...Rxb2   18.Nxe4   Rxe2   19.Nxd6   Rxe1+   20.Rxe1   exd6  

17.Bxa7   Rb7   18.Be3   Rfb8   19.Bc1   d4   20.Rd1  

a)   20.cxd4   exd4   21.Nbd2   Nc5  

20... Qc5   21.cxd4   exd4   22.Nbd2   d3   23.Qe1   Bxb2 There were so many variations to anazlye if Nxd2, but it may be better.

a)   23...Nxd2   24.Nxd2  

1)   24.Bxd2   Re7   25.Qf1   Rxb2  ;

2)   24.Rxd2   Re7   25.Qf1  ;

3)   24.Qxd2   Bxb2   25.Bxb2   Rxb2  

24... Re7   25.Qf1   Re2  

24.Bxb2  

a)   24.Nb3   Rxb3   25.axb3   Bxa1  

24... Rxb2   25.Nxe4   Bxe4   26.Nd2  

a)   26.Qxe4 ?? Qxf2+  

26... Bc6   27.Nb3   Qd5   28.Qf1   Re2   29.f3   Rbe8   30.Re1   Qe5   31.Rxe2   dxe2   32.Qe1   Ba4   33.Rb1   Bxb3   34.axb3  

a)   34.Rxb3   Qd4+   35.Kh1   Qd1  

34... Qc5+   35.Kh1   Qc2   36.Ra1   Qb2 White resigned here. 37.Ra6  

a)   37.h3   Qxa1   38.Qxa1   e1=Q+   39.Qxe1   Rxe1+  

37... Qc3 Brought to you by a backrank mate! 0-1





Tournament, June 9th, Round 2   2007-06-10 07:04



Loomis (0) - Opponent (0)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/loomis/?game=939
G/75 (2), MyTown, 2007.06.09

  1.d4   Nf6   2.c4   e6   3.Nf3   b6   4.Nc3   Bb7   5.e3   c5   6.d5   Qc7 This move seems awkward. Nb5 should be good for white at the right time, though I struggle with the right way to play against this. 7.e4   d6   8.Bg5   Be7   9.dxe6  

a)   9.e5 Leads to equality. dxe5   10.Nb5   Qc8   11.d6   Bd8   12.d7+   Qxd7   13.Nd6+  

1)   13.Qxd7+   Kxd7   14.Nxe5+   Ke7   15.O-O-O =

13... Ke7   14.Nxb7  

1)   14.Nxe5   Qxd6   15.Qxd6+   Kxd6   16.Nxf7+   Ke7   17.Nxh8   Bc7 -/+

14... Qxb7 =;

b)   9.Nb5 This may be the right way to play. 9... Qc8  

1)   9...Qd7   10.e5 +-

10.dxe6 +/-

9... fxe6   10.Bxf6 The idea here is that Bxf6 is met by Nb5 and Nxd6+; gxf6 leaves holes on the kingside, a potential Qh5+. 10... gxf6 But now I can't figure out how to get to the king. I thought about sacking on e5 and getting Qh5, but nothing happens in that line.

a)   10...Bxf6   11.Nb5   Qd7   12.Nxd6+   Kf8   13.e5   Be7  

1)   13...Bxf3 ?? 14.Qxf3  

11.Qd2  

a)   11.e5   fxe5   12.Nxe5   dxe5   13.Qh5+   Kd8   14.O-O-O+   Kc8 -+

11... h6   12.O-O-O   Nc6   13.Nb5 Winning the d6 pawn, but leaving black with all the activity. 13... Qd7   14.Nxd6+   Bxd6   15.Qxd6   Qxd6   16.Rxd6   Ke7   17.Rd2 White's pieces are bad, but I believe I can defend everything and slowly unravel my mess. 17... Rad8   18.Bd3   Nb4   19.Bb1   Rxd2   20.Kxd2   Rd8+   21.Ke2 Fortunately, there will be no penetration on the d-file. 21... Ba6   22.b3   Bb7  

a)   22...b5   23.cxb5   Bxb5+   24.Ke3  

23.Rd1   Rxd1   24.Kxd1   Kd6   25.Ke2   e5   26.Ke3   Nc6   27.Nh4   Nd4   28.g3   Bc8   29.Nf5+   Nxf5+  

a)   29...Bxf5   30.exf5  

30.exf5   Bb7   31.Be4   Bxe4   32.Kxe4 Now it's just technique. 32... h5   33.f4   exf4   34.Kxf4   a6   35.h3   b5   36.g4   hxg4   37.hxg4   bxc4   38.bxc4   Ke7   39.g5   fxg5+   40.Kxg5   Kf7   41.f6   a5   42.a4   Kg8   43.Kg6   Kf8   44.f7 1-0





earlier (8 more entries)