2007-10-07 14:40



Kalashnikow (0) - Nimzowitsch (0)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/temposchlucker/?game=983
? (), ,

  1...Ke7 Pivotal point=f4 weaknesses h3 and c3 2.Ng2 an attempt to exchange pieces which would render the pivotal point as useless. 2... Ra1+   3.Rc1   Ra2   4.Ne1   Kf7 With the rook manoeuvre a tempo is gained. 5.Rc2   Ra3   6.Ng2   Ra1+   7.Rc1   Ra2   8.Ne1   Kg6   9.Rc2   Ra3   10.f3   f5   11.Kf2   Kf6 To make room for the knight 12.Bc1   Ra1   13.Ke3   Ng6   14.Nd3   Bg3   15.Ne2   Ngf4   16.Ng1   Nxd3   17.Kxd3   Bf4   18.Ne2   Bxc1   19.Nxc1   Nf4+   20.Ke3   Nxh3 First weakness chopped off 21.Ne2   f4+   22.Kd2   Rf1 White resigns since f3 is gonna fall. 0-1





To find the losing move.   2007-09-08 19:43



(1980) - Temposchlucker (1743)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/temposchlucker/?game=982
Computer schaakpartij (), ,

  1.c4   e5   2.Nc3   Nc6   3.Nf3   f5   4.d4   e4   5.Ng5   Be7   6.Nh3   Nf6   7.g3   d5   8.c5   Be6   9.Bg2   O-O   10.O-O   h6   11.f3   Qd7   12.Rb1   g5   13.b4   f4   14.b5   Na5   15.Qa4   Nc4   16.Nf2   fxg3   17.hxg3   Nh5   18.fxe4   Nxg3   19.exd5   Nxf1   20.Qxc4   Bf5   21.d6+   Kg7   22.e4   Bg6   23.dxe7   Qxe7   24.Qxf1   Rad8   25.Bb2 1-0





Finally an endgame!   2007-07-28 23:04



PB (1847) - Temposchlucker (1738)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/temposchlucker/?game=951
open NK, Dieren, 2007.07.28

  1.e4   d5   2.exd5   Nf6   3.Bb5+   Bd7   4.Bc4   b5   5.Bb3   a5   6.a3   Bg4   7.f3 White signals that he wants to keep the pawn 7... Bc8   8.Nc3   Ba6   9.Nge2   c6   10.dxc6   Nxc6   11.d3   e6   12.Be3   Bd6   13.Ne4   Nxe4   14.dxe4   O-O   15.Nd4   Ne5   16.f4   Nc4   17.Bxc4   bxc4   18.c3   Qc7   19.Qg4   Rfe8   20.Rd1   Bf8   21.O-O   Qb7   22.Bc1   Qxe4   23.Rde1   Qg6   24.Qf3   Rab8   25.Re5   Bb7   26.Qe2   Bd5   27.Rg5   Qf6   28.Qd1   Bc5 Here my new acquired endgame knowledge starts to pay off. Everybody thinks that an endgame with bishops of opposite color is drawish. But that is not the case when there are other pieces around. The initiative is all important. Since the bishops live in a different universe, the attacker is effectively a piece up during his attack. 29.Kh1   Bxd4   30.cxd4   Rb3   31.f5   Rd3   32.Qe1   Rxd4   33.Qc3   e5   34.Rg3?   Qxf5   35.Kg1   Qh5   36.Rg5   Qe2   37.Qg3   g6   38.h3   Rd1   39.Rgf5   Rxf1+   40.Rxf1   Qd3   41.Qf2   Rb8   42.Kh2   Rb3   43.Bh6   f5   44.Re1   Qd4   45.Be3   Qxb2   46.Re2   Qxa3   47.Bc5   Qa1   48.Bd6   Qd4   49.Qe1   Rb2   50.Bxe5   Rxe2   51.Qxe2   Qe4   52.Qb2   Bb7   53.Bh8   Qxg2+ Here white resigned 0-1





  2007-07-24 21:40



AJ (1590) - Temposchlucker (1738)      http://www.chesslog.de/users/temposchlucker/?game=949
NK open (1), Dieren, 2007.07.24

  1.d4   Nf6   2.c4   e5 This is the Budapest gambit. When white takes, my knight goes to e4 with wild play. 3.d5 Giving me a nice diagonal 3... Bc5   4.e3   O-O Look at the difference in development already. What has white been doing all the time? Answer: moving pawns around. 5.Nc3   a5 To secure my bishop 6.Nf3   d6   7.Bd3   Re8   8.Qc2   Qe7   9.Ne4   Nbd7   10.Nfg5   h6   11.h4 A speculative knight sacrifice. 11... hxg5 I can't imagine I haven't enough defensive resources. Of course he get a nice initiative, but I'm willing to suffer. 12.hxg5   Nxe4   13.Bxe4   Bb4+   14.Kf1   Qxg5   15.Bh7+   Kf8   16.e4   Qd8 Qg4 is tabu due to Bf5. I have to defend the rook while leaving a square for my king. 17.Bf5   Nf6   18.Bg5   Bxf5   19.exf5   Ke7   20.a3   Bc5   21.Re1   Rh8   22.Bh4   Rh6   23.f4   Bd4   24.g4   Qh8   25.Qh2   Kd7   26.g5   Ng4   27.Qg3   Bf2 This one he had not seen. 28.Qxg4   Rxh4   29.Rxh4   Qxh4   30.Qxh4   Bxh4 0-1





earlier (17 more entries)